Members of the Wolfpack’s men’s basketball championship team sued the NCAA, seeking money for the use of their name, image ...

Every program across the state has a different interpretation of what data is subject to open records laws and how that data ...

The landmark House v. NCAA Settlement, approved earlier this summer, helped rewrite the NCAA rulebook, effectively ended ...

As athletes begin sharing in the revenue, the next decade will determine whether they gain real negotiating power. Part 1 of ...

Canady will also get the chance to reunite with former travel ball teammate Jackie Lis, who comes to Texas Tech after being one of the best players in the Missouri Valley Conference at Southern ...

Aug. 1 was a landmark date in college football. Schools could officially offer written revenue-sharing contracts to recruits, ...

The new agency vetting name, image and likeness deals in college sports reached an agreement that relaxes standards on player ...

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, approved a $2.576 billion settlement in ...

The NCAA guidance wasn’t completely ignored, says Blake Lawrence, the CEO of the NIL marketplace Opendorse, a company that helps manage several booster-led collectives.

Since the NCAA lifted its ban on college athletes earning money for use of their names, images and likenesses in the the summer of 2021, it has been operating without detailed rules regarding NIL.

The NCAA pushed back, but when two dozen states followed California, they gave up and issued draft NIL regulations. Importantly, almost all the state laws contained limitations on NIL, as did the ...

First, the NCAA's July 1, 2021 adoption of its Interim Name, Image, and Likeness Policy (NIL Policy), which, for the first time, allowed NCAA student athletes to earn NIL compensation without ...