The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic buffer zone laws, earning a fiery dissent from Justice Thomas.

Wars are not won merely by bombs. Today, they are won by bankrupting and impoverishing people (sanctions against nations and racism against people).

Income tax breaks and polarizing issues like a ban on DEI in schools and a proposed statue of controversial jurist Clarence Thomas are among the bills poised for action Thursday.

After all, the Supreme Court is stacked with six Republican appointees, including three selected by Trump in his first term. The

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, voting to uphold the conviction and death sentence, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett would have allowed a state appeals court to decide how to proceed.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote Monday that the Supreme Court should not let “confusion persist” regarding students’ free speech rights on

Dissenting Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said the court ultimately will need to intervene on a controversial free speech issue at universities across the country.

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away another opportunity to weigh the constitutionality of college bias response teams. Over the dissents of conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito,

The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed during back surgery at a military hospital.

For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.

Georgia Senate Republicans are once again pushing for Thomas to have a statue of himself, per Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Back in 2022, the party proposed a bill for the erection of his statue on the grounds of the state Capitol grounds but failed to get a vote in the state House,