In a little-covered speech, the Supreme Court justice explained how he thinks the court should reverse rulings conservatives don’t like.

Terry Gerton We have done several stories on this show lately about the safety threats to public workers, and I want to talk about an organization that you p

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) tore into President Trump on Wednesday after the commander-in-chief called on Grassley to scrap a tradition that Democrats have been exploiting to scuttle Trump’s judicial nominations.

There was a time when the Supreme Court of the United States stood as a beacon of justice, a true representation of “We the People.” It was an institution that upheld our freedoms, protected our rights, and served as a guardian of our democracy.

Threats against judges and their families have become blatant attempts to intimidate those serving in the judiciary, shaking their morale and damaging the public’s confidence in its courts.

The judiciary exists to interpret laws and ensure they comply with the Constitution. If the executive branch were to violate the constitutional rights of individuals—for example, by attempting to silence political opponents or outlaw religious ...

Quasi-judicial authorities were obliged to render reasoned and speaking orders, and that reasons should have been assigned by the adjudicating authority to the extent whether the circulars adduced by assessee were applicable to their case or not.